| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Cariou v. Prince ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Cariou v. Prince
''Cariou v. Prince'', 714 F. 3d 694 (2d Cir. 2013) is a copyright case in the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals, on the question of whether artist Richard Prince's appropriation art treatment of Patrick Cariou's photographs was a copyright infringement or a fair use. The Second Circuit held in 2013 that Prince's appropriation art ''could'' constitute fair use, and that a number of his works were transformative fair uses of Cariou's photographs.〔 The Court remanded to the District Court for reconsideration of 5 of Prince's works, the Supreme Court denied cert., and the case settled in 2014.〔Brian Boucher, ("Landmark Copyright Lawsuit Cariou v. Prince Is Settled" ), ''Art in America'', March 18, 2014.〕
==Background==
Photographer Patrick Cariou published in 2000 ''Yes, Rasta'' a book of photographs of the rastafarian community in Jamaica.〔 Richard Prince in 2008 created "Canal Zone", a series of art works incorporating Cariou's photographs.〔 Prince's works involved copying the original photographs and engaging in a variety of transformations. These included printing them, increasing them in size, blurring or sharpening, adding content (sometimes in color), and sometimes compositing multiple photographs together or with other works.〔 Prince exhibited his collection at Gagosian Gallery as appropriation art.
In 2009, Cariou filed a copyright infringement suit against Richard Prince, as well as Gagosian Gallery, Larry Gagosian (the founder and owner of the gallery), and RCS MediaGroup (which printed the exhibit catalog).〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Cariou v. Prince」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|